Korean Revision Rhinoplasty Doctors in 2026: Lee Byung-min, Choi Jae-won, Wi Hyung-gon and 7 More for Contracted Noses and Repeated Revisions
Korean Revision Rhinoplasty Doctors: 10 Physicians with Different Areas of Focus, from Nasal Tips and Short Noses to Contracted Noses
Ladies, it is easy to feel torn when rhinoplasty has not given you the nose shape you hoped for. The tip may turn upward too much, the nostrils may be overly visible, or the nose may feel stiff. Even after several revisions, your expectations may still remain unmet.
This guide brings together 10 Korean revision rhinoplasty doctors, including Lee Byung-min, Choi Jae-won, Kim Jae-hoon, and Wi Hyung-gon. Their profiles cover different areas of focus, from natural-looking nasal tips and structural reconstruction to short-nose lengthening and repeated revision surgery. Save this guide as you research your options and compare them at your own pace.
Five Doctors to Start With: Different Approaches to Nasal Design and Revision
1. Lee Byung-min (李丙玟) | Cheongdam First Plastic Surgery
Key areas of focus: cartilage shaping, a natural-looking nasal tip, and overall balance.
Lee Byung-min’s nasal surgery profile focuses on cartilage adjustment and tip shaping. Rather than simply aiming for a higher bridge, it emphasizes the relationship between the tip, nasal wings, and columella so that the nose fits more harmoniously with the whole face.
Cartilage use: Preserving and adjusting existing cartilage helps shape and support the tip. Material selection depends on the condition of the nose.
A natural-looking shape: The transition at the nasal root, the bridge line, and the tip curve are considered together, reducing discrepancies that can arise when design focuses on the side view and overlooks the front.
Revision details: Nostril symmetry, tip position, and the connection with the nasal wings all contribute to the appearance of the nose.
2. Choi Jae-won (崔宰源) | Pure Plastic Surgery (純真整形外科)
Key areas of focus: mesh materials, implant management, and structural adjustment.
Material use is a distinct focus in Choi Jae-won’s revision rhinoplasty profile. Revision involves more than removing an old implant and replacing it with a new material; it also involves rearranging surrounding tissue and nasal tip support.
Material selection: Mesh and other materials need to be assessed according to their purpose, placement, and individual circumstances. A more unusual material is not necessarily a better fit.
Structural revision: Tightness, visible implant contours, or changes in nasal shape require attention to the underlying cause before the appearance is adjusted.
Style planning: A straight nose, a slightly upturned nose, or a natural-looking shape should work with facial shape and feature proportions.
3. Kim Jae-hoon (金載勳) | April 31 Plastic Surgery
Key areas of focus: repeated revisions, nasal tip support, and scar management.
Kim Jae-hoon’s profile focuses on more complex revision needs. A nose that has undergone several operations may require simultaneous attention to scarring, insufficient cartilage, and changes in tissue condition.
Tip reconstruction: Attention to tip shape and its supporting structure allows appearance changes to be based on structural assessment.
Repeated revisions: Problems remaining from earlier operations are reviewed before priorities are set for the next revision.
Long-term observation: Revision results should not be judged solely from photos taken immediately after suture removal. Shape and stability after the nose has settled also deserve attention.
4. Min Sung-ki (閔成基) | Wonjin Plastic Surgery
Key areas of focus: refined contours, overall design, and facial proportions.
Overall planning matters when you want a refined nose without disrupting facial balance. Min Sung-ki’s nasal surgery profile covers the bridge, tip, and nasal base, emphasizing how these parts work together.
Profile contours: Bridge height, tip curvature, and the transition between the nose and forehead together determine the side view.
Front-view proportions: Nasal width, the shape of the nasal wings, and tip size need to remain in balance with facial contours.
Individual style: A softer, more defined, or more refined nose shape needs to be based on individual anatomy.
5. Song Yoon-sang (宋潤相)
Key areas of focus: closed rhinoplasty, incision planning, and structural adjustment.
Song Yoon-sang’s nasal surgery profile centers on the closed approach. This technique places incisions inside the nose and attracts interest from people concerned about external incisions.
Incision planning: Incision location and the extent of surgical access need to be considered together with revision requirements.
Approach selection: Open and closed techniques each have appropriate applications. The central issue is whether the necessary adjustments can be completed.
Revision goals: Improvements in shape, reconstruction of support, and functional needs determine the specific plan.
Five More Doctors to Explore: Contracted Noses and Natural-Looking Shapes
6. Wi Hyung-gon (魏亨坤) | WILL Plastic Surgery
Key areas of focus: contracted noses, cartilage support, and skin tension.
Wi Hyung-gon’s revision rhinoplasty profile focuses on contracted noses and cartilage use. An upturned tip, excessive nostril exposure, or tightness cannot be addressed simply by changing the tip angle; skin and soft-tissue conditions also need to be considered.
Cartilage support: The supporting structure provides the basis for planning changes to tip position and nasal shape.
Tissue assessment: Skin tension and the capacity of nasal skin to stretch influence the extent of revision.
Functional considerations: Nasal blockage or breathing difficulties need to be included in the assessment.
7. Lim Young-min (任榮旻) | VG Plastic Surgery
Key areas of focus: nasal design, proportion adjustment, and detailed shaping.
Lim Young-min’s nasal surgery profile covers the bridge line, tip position, and overall proportions. Revision needs to address obvious concerns while also considering details from different angles.
Overall design: Changes to the bridge and tip should be judged in the context of the whole face.
Detail work: Nostril symmetry, columella shape, and the transition to the nasal wings influence how natural the nose looks.
Visual communication: Digital images can help illustrate a design direction, but simulations are not the same as actual results.
8. Choi Woo-sik (崔寓植)
Key areas of focus: natural-looking shapes, soft transitions, and harmony with facial features.
People who prefer a natural appearance usually care about how the nose fits with their other features. Choi Woo-sik’s nasal shape profile emphasizes softer lines and the transitions between the root, bridge, and tip.
Tip shape: Upward rotation and height need to be proportionate so that the tip does not become an overly prominent feature.
Contour transitions: A natural appearance comes from coordination between the parts, rather than simply making the nose lower.
Everyday appearance: Balance from the front and side, and during changes in facial expression, all deserve attention.
9. Kim Hye-young (金惠英) | GNG Plastic Surgery
Key areas of focus: short noses, nostril exposure, and tip position.
Kim Hye-young’s profile mainly addresses short noses and nostril exposure. These concerns may look similar, but can involve different factors, including tip position, nasal wing shape, and overall proportions.
Short-nose adjustment: The extent of lengthening needs to account for skin, soft tissue, and structural support.
Nostril shape: Reducing excessive nostril exposure needs to be planned within the overall nasal design.
Aftercare: Follow-up visits, postsurgical assessment, and communication across countries are all part of the revision process.
10. Roh Bong-il (魯峰一) | Glory Plastic Surgery (歌柔飛整形外科)
Key areas of focus: customized planning, material configuration, and tissue conditions.
Roh Bong-il’s revision rhinoplasty profile involves customized materials and individualized design. Nasal bone shape, skin thickness, and existing implants all influence the plan.
Individual configuration: Materials need to match nasal structures; increasing height should not be the only aim.
Thin-skin assessment: When the skin is thinner after repeated revisions, the extent of adjustment requires greater caution.
Postsurgical management: Swelling reduction and the stabilization of nasal shape vary from person to person. Care should follow the doctor’s instructions.
A Revision Rhinoplasty Checklist: Points to Save
Do not judge by a single attractive postsurgical photo.
Similar surgical records, the timing of photographs, and long-term follow-up offer more value for comparison than one image.
Do not focus on only one material.
Ear cartilage, septal cartilage, rib cartilage, and other materials each have uses and limitations. A plan suited to your circumstances is what matters.
Prepare records of your previous operations.
The dates of earlier surgery, implanted materials, postsurgical concerns, and medication history all help the doctor understand the condition of your nose.
Review costs and aftercare together.
Surgery, anesthesia, materials, follow-up visits, and contact arrangements after returning home all need to be clarified beforehand.
Revision rhinoplasty carries hopes for a different appearance, but also requires an understanding of surgical limitations and risks. This list of 10 doctors, including Lee Byung-min, Choi Jae-won, and Wi Hyung-gon, can serve as a starting point for your research. Understanding your own circumstances, the specific plan, and subsequent care before deciding can make the process more informed and reassuring.